When Life is a Dumpster Fire: What to Do When the Chariot Wheels Fall Off

The Bhagavad Gita begins in the middle of what may be one of the largest and most consequential family conflicts in literary history.

There are rival branches of a royal family, sibling jealousy, political manipulation, humiliation, betrayal, exile, broken agreements, simmering resentments, and a rigged dice game that goes so catastrophically badly that “perhaps we should stop gambling now” really ought to have occurred to someone much earlier.

The Pandava brothers lose their wealth, their kingdom, their freedom, and nearly everything else in a game of dice. Not in battle. Not during a military invasion. Not because of an economic collapse.

Dice.

One brother keeps gambling long after every sensible internal alarm should have been ringing. Meanwhile, the other Pandavas are forced to sit there developing collective agita as he wagers away the kingdom one throw at a time. By the end of the evening, someone should have called the gambling hotline, frozen the royal accounts, changed the banking passwords, and passed around the antacids.

Eventually, after years of exile, failed negotiations, escalating hostility, and what must have been some exceptionally uncomfortable extended-family gatherings, the conflict reaches the battlefield of Kurukshetra.

Two enormous armies assemble, complete with chariots, warriors, elephants, banners, armor, weapons, conch shells, and generations of unresolved emotional material lined up in military formation.

Arjuna, one of the Pandava brothers, is a highly trained warrior. He is skilled, disciplined, and familiar with battle. He understands the injustice that brought everyone to this point. His family has been deceived, humiliated, exiled, and denied the return of their kingdom. Attempts at peace have failed. The battle appears unavoidable.

Then Arjuna asks Krishna—his friend, cousin, adviser, and charioteer—to drive the chariot into the space between the two armies so he can look at the people gathered against him.

This proves to be a spectacularly bad idea.

There are times when gaining perspective is helpful. There are also times when gaining perspective means realizing that both armies contain everyone who came to your childhood birthday parties.

Arjuna looks across the battlefield and does not see anonymous enemies. He sees cousins, friends, teachers, elders, mentors, and beloved members of his own family. These are not strangers. These are people whose names he knows, whose homes he has visited, and who may have seen him go through an awkward adolescent phase.

Suddenly, the abstract idea of fighting for justice becomes the reality of killing people he loves. His body reacts before his philosophy can catch up. He begins trembling. His mouth goes dry. His skin burns. His famous bow slips from his hands. His legs weaken, his mind spins, and he sinks into the bottom of the chariot.

Arjuna has reached the point many of us know well: the moment when the competent, functional part of the personality abruptly goes on strike.

He tells Krishna, essentially: I can't do this. I don't want to do this. Everything about this is horrifying. Perhaps I will simply remain down here.

This is not cowardice. It is grief, dread, moral conflict, love, loyalty, responsibility, terror, and the unbearable recognition that every available choice will cause pain.

Arjuna is not merely afraid that he may die. He is afraid that he may survive.

He imagines the destruction of families, customs, communities, relationships, and the entire social order. He worries that even victory will feel like devastation. He is caught between competing duties, conflicting loyalties, and consequences too large for any one nervous system to comfortably process.

In modern clinical language, Arjuna has gone far beyond his window of tolerance. His nervous system has packed a small bag, left the battlefield, and forwarded all future correspondence to Krishna.

Fortunately, Krishna is already there.

He is holding the reins.

The Charioteer Is Not Merely the Charioteer

Arjuna knows Krishna. He knows him as a friend, relative, trusted ally, adviser, and companion. They have eaten together, traveled together, spoken casually, joked, rested, and shared ordinary human moments.

What Arjuna does not yet fully understand is who Krishna actually is. He does not grasp that the person holding the reins is also the divine reality underlying existence itself.

This is significantly more than one generally expects from one’s Uber driver.

Arjuna believes he is having a crisis in front of his friend. In reality, he is having a crisis in conversation with the ground of being.

The Bhagavad Gita is the conversation that follows.

Krishna does not shame Arjuna for falling apart. He does not say, “This is really not the best time for this,” nor does he gesture toward the assembled armies and remind him that everyone is waiting.

He also does not offer the kind of reassurance we sometimes give when we desperately want another person to stop feeling uncomfortable: It will all be fine. Everything happens for a reason. Just think positively.

Krishna does something more demanding and more compassionate.

He helps Arjuna see clearly.

He teaches him about action, responsibility, attachment, identity, devotion, wisdom, and the deeper Self. He asks Arjuna to examine not only what he feels, but what those feelings are asking him to do—or avoid doing.

The teaching is ancient. The predicament is painfully familiar.

What do we do when life asks something of us that we do not want to do? How do we act when there is no guarantee that things will turn out well? How do we know whether we are listening to wisdom or simply trying to escape discomfort while calling it wisdom? And what happens when doing nothing is not actually neutral?

You Are Responsible for the Action, Not the Outcome

One of Krishna’s most important teachings is that we are responsible for our actions, but we do not control the results.

This feels like a serious design flaw.

Many of us would strongly prefer to be responsible for the action only after receiving written confirmation that the outcome will be satisfactory.

We want guarantees. We will begin when we know it will work. We will speak honestly when we know the other person will respond maturely. We will set a boundary when we know nobody will become angry. We will make the change when we know we will not regret it. We will submit the manuscript when we know someone will publish it. We will take the risk when it is no longer risky.

Unfortunately, the universe has been notably uncooperative in providing these assurances.

Krishna tells Arjuna to attend to the integrity of his action rather than trying to manipulate the entire future. This does not mean outcomes are irrelevant. It means that our desperate attachment to a particular result can distort the action itself.

We become so focused on securing success, approval, certainty, or praise that we lose sight of whether the choice is honest, ethical, or truly ours.

We can prepare. We can seek counsel. We can examine our motives. We can act carefully and try to reduce harm. We can make a spreadsheet. We can even make a second spreadsheet with better headings and highlights.

But eventually, we reach the edge of what we control.

This is especially difficult for those of us who have spent years privately believing that sufficient vigilance, overthinking, anticipatory anxiety, and responsible list-making might eventually earn us a minor administrative position in the management of the cosmos.

It will not.

Our responsibility is to act as clearly and faithfully as we can. The outcome belongs to a much larger field of causes, choices, people, accidents, timing, history, weather, temperament, and other variables that stubbornly refuse to report to us.

Inaction Is Still an Action

Arjuna wants to withdraw. He considers refusing to fight, walking away from his responsibility, and abandoning the whole terrible situation.

At first glance, this sounds peaceful. Possibly noble. Maybe even spiritual.

There is something very appealing about avoiding a difficult obligation once we can blame Mercury being in retrograde.

Krishna is not convinced.

He reminds Arjuna that refusing to act does not remove him from the consequences of the situation. Inaction is still an action. Not choosing is still a choice. Not speaking has effects. Not intervening has effects. Not setting the boundary teaches people something about what will be tolerated. Not addressing the harmful pattern allows the pattern to continue enjoying excellent job security.

This does not mean we should respond to every problem by charging forward with a weapon and a strong opinion. Sometimes waiting is wise. Sometimes restraint is the action. Sometimes leaving is the action. Sometimes the most mature thing we can do is stop talking before we make the situation dramatically worse.

The question is not whether we are moving. The question is whether our stillness is grounded in discernment or fear.

Are we choosing not to act because restraint is genuinely the wisest response? Or are we hoping that if we ignore it long enough, the difficult thing will assume we have fled the country under an assumed name?

It usually does not.

Action in Inaction and Inaction in Action

Krishna teaches that the wise person learns to see action in inaction and inaction in action.

This is one of those teachings that is about as immediately clear as a Zen koan and may cause a slight ache behind the eyes. Most of us nod thoughtfully first and hope understanding arrives later.

But the teaching is remarkably practical.

A person can be extraordinarily busy while doing absolutely nothing that matters. We can answer emails, rearrange bookshelves, organize digital photographs, research the ideal journal, compare fourteen meditation apps, clean the refrigerator, and decide that today is finally the day to alphabetize the spices.

We may accomplish a remarkable amount. None of it will be the difficult conversation we are avoiding.

This is inaction in action. Outwardly, there is tremendous movement. Meanwhile, the difficult thing has taken over our internal sofa, put its feet on the coffee table, and settled in like an unwelcome guest who appears to have changed his mailing address.

The reverse is also true. A person may appear to be doing nothing while undertaking enormous inner action.

Pausing before reacting is an action. Sitting with grief instead of immediately escaping it is an action. Allowing anger to settle before sending the message is an action. Questioning an inherited belief is an action. Refusing to repeat a family pattern is an action. Choosing not to rescue someone from the consequences of their own behavior can be an action of almost heroic proportions.

A person may be sitting quietly on the edge of the bed while dismantling forty years of conditioning. This will not appear on a productivity tracker. No little ring will close. Nobody will send a congratulatory notification.

Nevertheless, something important is happening.

Krishna asks us to look beneath appearances. Busy is not always purposeful. Still is not always passive. Avoidance can wear running shoes. Courage can look like sitting down.

Do the Work That Is Yours to Do

Krishna repeatedly brings Arjuna back to dharma: the responsibility, path, or work that belongs to him. This may be my favorite teaching in the Gita!

This is not a command to blindly obey every role, rule, expectation, or cultural demand placed upon us. Nor does it mean that we must remain in harmful circumstances because someone has declared suffering to be our spiritual assignment.

Dharma requires discernment.

What is truly mine to do? Not what will make everyone happy. Not what will make me look impressive. Not the career my mother selected for me when I was eight because she had already told the entire family I was going to be a doctor.

What is mine?

Sometimes it is caring for someone. Sometimes it is leaving. Sometimes it is apologizing. Sometimes it is speaking. Sometimes it is refusing. Sometimes it is resting before resentment turns us into someone nobody should be required to live with. Sometimes it is creating. Sometimes it is grieving.

And occasionally, though this is rarely mentioned in sacred texts, it is completing the form, making the appointment, returning the phone call, or opening the envelope we have been moving around the kitchen for two weeks.

Krishna cautions against abandoning our own path because another person’s life looks easier, more elegant, more spiritual, or more successful.

Someone else may appear to be moving through life with perfect clarity. This is often because we are viewing them from a distance and cannot see their laundry, browser history, family group text, or the pile of unopened mail behind the decorative basket.

Our work is not to perform someone else’s life more attractively.

It is to inhabit our own with integrity.

The Frightened Part Is Not the Whole Self

Arjuna is speaking from a part of himself that is overwhelmed. That part is terrified. It is grieving. It sees only loss.

Its concerns are not foolish or imaginary. Krishna does not dismiss them. But he does ask Arjuna to recognize that the frightened and reactive part of him is not the whole of who he is.

The Gita distinguishes between the changing mind—with its fears, desires, attachments, aversions, and dramatic weather systems—and the deeper Self.

The Self is not destroyed by every change in circumstance. It is not identical to our role, reputation, success, failure, body, mood, or current catastrophic interpretation of events.

This does not mean pain is unreal. It means pain is not the entirety of the person experiencing it.

We are larger than the part of us currently curled into a ball in the bottom of the chariot.

That part deserves care. It may need rest, compassion, reassurance, grounding, therapy, tea, and perhaps a brief break from the news. But it should not automatically be handed the reins.

We all have inner parts that become convinced they are the sole authority. The anxious part believes everything is dangerous. The ashamed part believes everything is ruined. The angry part believes every problem would improve if everyone else were finally told exactly what is wrong with them. The exhausted part believes no future effort will ever be possible. The people-pleasing part believes that preventing disappointment in others is our sacred and apparently full-time duty.

The controlling part believes that, while the universe has historically been difficult to manage, this may simply be because nobody else has approached it with our level of commitment.

Krishna asks Arjuna to step back from the immediate storm and remember the larger Self.

You are afraid, but you are not only fear. You are grieving, but you are not only grief. You are confused, but you are not confusion itself.

A storm is moving through the mind.

The sky remains.

Spiritual Wisdom Does Not Get Us Out of Life

Arjuna is understandably interested in an answer that will allow him to escape the entire situation. Perhaps he can renounce everything. Perhaps he can leave the battlefield. Perhaps he can disappear into a forest and become very spiritual at a safe distance from all relatives.

Many of us understand the appeal.

Krishna does not give him an escape route disguised as enlightenment. He teaches a spirituality of participation.

Wisdom does not necessarily remove us from life. It changes how we enter it.

We can act without hatred. We can care without trying to control every result. We can work without tying our entire worth to whether we succeed. We can remain connected inwardly while engaged outwardly. We can do difficult things without turning difficulty into our identity.

This teaching matters because it is delivered on a battlefield—not in a silent retreat center, not in a mountain cave, and not in a lovely studio where everyone has a matching cushion and nobody’s phone has gone off.

Krishna teaches Arjuna while armies are waiting, weapons are drawn, and the family situation has progressed well beyond what could reasonably be addressed through better communication skills.

There are times when we need retreat. We need quiet, rest, sanctuary, reflection, and distance. But most of us eventually have to return to where our lives are happening.

There are relationships, losses, ethical dilemmas, aging parents, financial worries, difficult choices, illnesses, unfinished work, and people who inexplicably continue to use “reply all.”

The question is not whether we can permanently avoid the world. The question is whether we can remain connected to something deeper while participating in it.

Krishna Was Holding the Reins All Along

Later in the Gita, Krishna reveals his universal form to Arjuna.

Arjuna suddenly sees that Krishna is not merely his wise friend, loyal ally, and highly overqualified charioteer. He is the vast divine reality containing creation, destruction, time, life, death, and the entire unfolding universe.

Arjuna realizes that he has been speaking rather informally to infinity.

He has eaten with Krishna, joked with him, rested beside him, questioned him, argued with him, and perhaps addressed him with the casual tone one reserves for someone who has known us long enough to be unimpressed.

Then Krishna reveals the cosmic form.

This must have been an awkward moment.

Arjuna essentially realizes: I may have been talking to the source of all existence like two cousins complaining about the family group chat.

He apologizes for the familiarity with which he has treated Krishna because he had not understood the fullness of who was beside him.

The revelation is terrifying, overwhelming, and also deeply comforting.

The divine was not somewhere far beyond the battlefield waiting for Arjuna to become calmer, wiser, and more spiritually presentable. It was already there. It was beside him while he trembled. It listened while he despaired. It remained while he questioned everything. It held the reins while he could not lift his bow.

Arjuna believed he was alone with an impossible decision.

He was not.

That may be one of the most beautiful teachings in the story.

Wisdom may already be present in the middle of our crisis, though we may initially recognize it only as the quiet voice sitting beside us.

The sacred does not always arrive with thunder, certainty, or a detailed five-year plan. Sometimes it appears as the next breath, the friend who stays, the therapist who asks the right question, the silence after panic has exhausted itself, or the small, steady knowing beneath all the noise.

Sometimes grace does not remove the battlefield.

Sometimes grace is discovering who has been holding the reins.

When Life Is a Dumpster Fire

The Bhagavad Gita does not give us a cheerful formula for making life painless.

It does not promise that good actions will always produce immediate rewards. It does not tell us that every difficult choice will become obvious if we meditate correctly. It does not suggest that spiritual maturity means we will never again collapse dramatically in the bottom of our own chariot.

Sometimes life is painful. Sometimes every choice carries loss. Sometimes we know what we must do and still wish someone else would do it. Sometimes we do not know what to do at all.

The Gita tells us that we can learn to act without clinging to a certain result, pause without avoiding, care without controlling, and participate in life without completely losing ourselves inside it.

We can ask: What is mine to do? What am I avoiding? What outcome am I trying to control? Am I acting from wisdom, fear, attachment, love, ego, or a complicated casserole involving all five? Am I genuinely waiting for clarity, or have I reorganized the pantry three times because I already know the answer? Can I take one honest step without demanding a preview of the entire future?

And perhaps most importantly: Who—or what—is holding the reins when I cannot?

When life is a dumpster fire, we do not have to pretend everything is fine. We may need to sit down in the chariot. We may need to grieve, tremble, protest, question, and admit that we have no idea what comes next.

Krishna does not ask Arjuna to skip that part.

But eventually, he asks him to see more clearly—to remember that fear is present, but it is not the whole Self; to discern the action that is truly his; to loosen his grip on the outcome; and to trust that he is not alone in the chariot.

And, when he is ready, to stand back up.

---

Janet Nash, MSW, LISW-S, Yoga Therapist, CCTP, is a psychotherapist, writer, and founder of Interiority Wellness. Her work explores mental health, generational healing, creativity, nature, and the quiet ways we find our way back to ourselves.